Search results

One of the arguments for random map selection is to get rare maps every once in awhile. It'd be cool to see a "Rare map" option on the map selection screen that selects maps that are less often played. I wouldn't make it an option that comes up on every map vote screen, but it'd be a fun treat...

Inspired by the flying scoutsman thread. Flying Scoutsman 18/20 times is a shitty fun round. However, some maps, it does work really well. I don't think removing less-liked gamemodes is the right idea, but I do think it would be fun to be able to vote for a fun-round instead of it being...

I can at the very least confirm that Supporter showed at one point in this picture that @Darktooth posted in a private chat awhile back lol

Tagging @server to handle your appeal. Thank you for your patience! They should respond in about an hour.

power meow

-1 titan — I’m voting no based on your recent conduct: You publicly blew up at a staff member in the “Light Mode” thread, writing “The webmaster is harassing me!!!” and “FUCKYOUFUCKYOUFUCKYOU!!!”. That kind of outburst toward staff is the opposite of de-escalation and professionalism a...

I think one aspect that is being ignored here is that this already is against the rules in one shape of form. If proven to be intentional, hiding a body with DNA intentionally from a detective can be interpreted as game throwing and/or toxic gameplay. It's more of a complex situation- which is...

This application is absolute dog shit. In fact, my puppy ate a couple crayons last week and shit some out that look better than this application. You didn't spend anytime at all, and honestly, you could have probably just taken a note out of @Storm's book and have ChatGPT fill it out for you...

CBA to put these in order, but here are some games I spent a lot of time with.

yeah. I'm totally good with that + Nura's suggestion.

Ah, I can see how it'd be interpreted that way, yeah, but I can also see some shitlord saying "Um, excuse me. I MOVED and the moved back to the same spot".

Eh, I get that, but I kind of disagree. That means in order to kill them you gotta keep an eye on them for that total minute in order to kill for it. Currently, it's pretty much a slightly discretionary judgement call even with the last two minutes of the round. Honestly, if you go AFK in the...

Current rule: 2. AFK players may be killed when there are less than two minutes left in the round. Change to: 2. AFK players may be killed after 3 minutes have elapsed in the round. (or however @Siddo wants to reword this) Rationale: Sometimes rounds can extend to 10 minutes+. AFKs being safe...

It's funny. I was actually apart of the discussions as lead when this changed over at SGM. It was a REALLY hot topic of debate. In both of your scenarios here:these would in fact be RDM. In order to kill for it, you would need to see the C4 go from it's unarmed state (no timer) to an armed state...

+1, although I understand why AFKing is being incentivized. Having users AFK the server increases the total population on the server, which helps it appear higher on server lists.

Tagging @Noctorious for your appeal. He'll be on here soon to explain why your ban describing sexual acts with children was considered disturbing.

Yeah, I'm okay with that. Gamblers going to gamble. I'd hope he does that after me to increase the pot. If we want to create a lottery that is more inclusive to a larger amount of people who want a low-risk pool then, I wouldn't mind there being a separate "safer" baby-lottery I suppose. Ik...

Yeah, that's fine. It's still more points than would be in the lottery if he didn't do that. I really don't care if he has more points left over for himself when he's done.

-1; but not a passionate -1. I just have a different perspective. This probably won't be agreed on, which is totally fine, but I at least want to offer a differing perspective. I personally like seeing these chained wins because as someone who also participates it 1) makes the pot even higher...