Pending Small Weapon Balance Ideas (Winchester 1887 Delay Decrease)

uintancæstir

uintancæstir

Active member
Small group of weapon balancing ideas.
  • Deagle cone decrease (0.02 -> 0.013)
  • Colt Python cone decrease (0.02 -> 0.009)
  • Barret M82A1 delay decrease (1.5 -> 0.7)
  • M24 delay increase (0.7 -> 1.2)
  • Winchester 1887 delay decrease (1.2 -> 0.75)
  • Winchester 1873 cone decrease (0.01 -> 0.007)
  • Winchester 1873 clip size increase (8 -> 10)
Currently I feel the Winchester 1887 is a bit slow considering it only has 4 bullets.

Feedback & questions are appreciated.



Update (Mar 13, 2026): Demonstrated Deagle cone.
Update (Mar 4, 2026): Included some other changes thanks to @CelDamage's Spreadsheet.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 10 Downvote
uintancæstir said:
Update (Mar 13, 2026): Demonstrated Deagle cone.

Click to expand...
yeah thats why I think it should have the good good cone, but the question now is does the 1911 have the cone that the deagle currently has, that way we have two pinpoint accuracy pistols that can one tap (python and deagle), one faster one with non-perfect accuracy (1911) and luger + remmington as two other one tap options that fill out a more special niche
 
CelDamage said:
but the question now is does the 1911 have the cone that the deagle currently has?
Click to expand...
I think the 1911's cone should be fine where it is right now, but the Deagle is slower so it should be more accurate.
From most accurate to least accurate cones for me would be:
Python (0.007) > Deagle (0.013) > Colt M1911 (0.017) > Luger (0.017 but currently having less body shot damage) > Remington (0.02)
All with headshot falloff at very large distances to encourage using snipers at long range of course.
CelDamage said:
remmington
Click to expand...
Has anyone ever figured out how the cone for the Remington 1858 works, or what it's value is?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top