Steam Workshop::TTT Advanced Disguiser
If you manage to knife somebody (no damage), you can steal their identity and wear their name
Pending T weapon: Doppleganger
- Thread starter Chipp
- Start date
If you manage to knife somebody (no damage), you can steal their identity and wear their name
pretty sure it isn't, just the name that's shown over your character
I'm okay with this, you have my +1 then
I've been thinking recently about the disguiser and having a traitor wear a missing in action's name as a beautiful disguise. I could ramble how seriously some people take our common sense rulings and how this could muddy the waters for our players, but the best scenario I actually got is:
wink is a talkative innocent man, talking about how happy gilmore 2 was good until it transitioned its plot to something fucking stupid. Right when wink is about to talk about the scene where bad bunny lathers travis kelce with honey, he gets cut off mid-sentence by a knife and has his beautiful disguise stolen. The traitor role playing as wink sits there silently and is unable to continue talking about how travis kelce is also bound to a post and has a bear fast approaching him, leading fellow innocents to assume wink got knifed and his face stolen, and a kill off sus occurs as "not talking about happy gilmore 2 coherently" isn't a traitorous act.
The easy solution would to be to change it up for an advanced disguiser to only be able to take a confirmed dead man's name; that way any innocent paying attention can make the kill validly off the confirmed dead list rather than some sus voice scenarios.
wink is a talkative innocent man, talking about how happy gilmore 2 was good until it transitioned its plot to something fucking stupid. Right when wink is about to talk about the scene where bad bunny lathers travis kelce with honey, he gets cut off mid-sentence by a knife and has his beautiful disguise stolen. The traitor role playing as wink sits there silently and is unable to continue talking about how travis kelce is also bound to a post and has a bear fast approaching him, leading fellow innocents to assume wink got knifed and his face stolen, and a kill off sus occurs as "not talking about happy gilmore 2 coherently" isn't a traitorous act.
The easy solution would to be to change it up for an advanced disguiser to only be able to take a confirmed dead man's name; that way any innocent paying attention can make the kill validly off the confirmed dead list rather than some sus voice scenarios.
I mean this as inoffensively as possible, this is what that sounded like:
I don't see the issue with the situation you provided. Are you saying it is valid to kill someone based off of them not finishing their story in voice chat? And then it would be conflicting between the T claiming RDM and inno claiming common sense?? Sorry, I'm completely lost
Attachments
I'm saying it could add scenarios where players are likely to kill off suspicion rather than cold hard facts; making it so a disguiser can only disguise you as confirmed dead players would still make the device a KOS when logic is applied correctly but does mask a player better than a typical disguiser.