Invalid Weiss's TTT Report Against Zyp; Pixie Dimitri

Status
Not open for further replies.

Weiss

New member
Your IGN
Weiss​
Your SteamID
STEAM_0:0:41290763​
Reported Player's IGN
Zyp; Pixie Dimitri​
Reported Player's SteamID
STEAM_0:1:76063763 STEAM_0:0:149133622​
Map(s) incident occured
Metropolis​
Reason for Report
GpUrr5yRRJp9.png
your rules say no prop surfing to unreachable areas​
the bottom area of metropolis is not unreachable even if you can get there *easier* by prop surfing. even sgm allowed that area despite their own very very similar rule set (shit it might even be the same rules idk)​
i can show you and quite a few other people as well how to get there without having to manipulate any props or anything to get there. you just have to land on the geometry of a trash can.​
now - if you want to make it an illegal area, kill box it or remove the trash can or add the exception to your rules. as is, your rules dictate that the bottom area of metropolis is a-okay to go to.​
in addition, zyp tped me to get me out - without warning - and it got me killed because he placed me close to an edge. reason for the marked mods is that they were the only ones actually unstucking people.​
EDIT: i should specify- im not looking for vindication or anything. i just want a clarification on the rules. the place is allowed by the rules atm, so if you dont want it allowed, change the rules. and i think if you do unstuck without someone asking for it in the first place, you should at least warn them or not place them in dangerous positions​
Evidence and Witnessess
i dont record but the mods know what im talking about​
i can record evi of the very easy ability to get down there if you want me to​
Time & Time Zone
approx 1:40-1:40pm PST​
 
Last edited:
Hey Weiss, I have seen this report and I am uploading the clips I have of it currently. However, we did verbally warn multiple people including yourself that it is an unintended area and considered unreachable, we had used !unstuck multiple times on multiple players. Specifically Guy, you, and Adrian were all !unstuck 'd multiple times throughout all 6 rounds. We said please do not go down, and you guys continued.

1752267948952.png

The wording on the rules should be fixed. However how we have been informed as staff has been that unreachable areas are included, and that this area is considered unreachable by all intended purposes. As such you were teleported and warned.
 
> However, we did verbally warn multiple people including yourself that it is an unintended area and considered unreachable, we had used !unstuck multiple times on multiple players.

mods don't have discretion to make this assumption, by any part of the current rule set it is not unreachable. its not included in any of the map-specific rules and still does not fall under any of the listed rules that you and i have understood as the basis of this conversation. should probably update the rules to include moderator discretion to this extent if this is something you want to just instantly start to enforce.
how we have been informed as staff has been that unreachable areas are included, and that this area is considered unreachable by all intended purposes.
if this is the case, then rules should be updated immediately it is not fair to players for a rule update to be made behind the scenes and then hold those players to a rule update that they dont know about.
 
I just want to respond with this, WeissRules.PNG Refer to the 2nd rule on the !motd if you were ordered warning and instruction multiple times you should have refrained from doing it again.
 
As it may become pertinent to the verdict of this report, please be aware that since the creation of this report, the rules have been clarified. They now more accurately reflect the ruling as it is applied.

This is being posted only for clarity's sake. Please bear in mind that any discussions regarding this clarification are better suited to other threads - this report is not the place to have them.
1752273768087.png
 
Hey Weiss. I apologize for the experience you have had on the server.

One major rule of moderators is that they follow their rules provided to them to the letter, and generally must go to an admin or greater for discretion regarding rulings like this.

Something to keep in mind about this situation is that Zyp had acted on what were considered the rules and protocol at the time. You are correct to say that that area is in fact reachable without the use of props, and should be able to be accessed in theory.

The problem with "unreachable" areas is that they tend to cause delays in the game, which makes things uncomfortable for everyone waiting, especially during overtime or the end of a round.

So whether or not you had a right to as of the current rules be there - you were warned to attempt to leave that area or risk being slain/brought. You had clearly seen others being brought for the same reason. It was inevitable you'd be brought for the same reason had you not complied.

Zyp did nothing wrong in this capacity and was acting on what he knows in the listed protocol. Next time please refrain from trying to access unintended areas of the map.

Report Invalid. I will not be locking it up as @Lightning will need to give his two cents regarding his side.

Thank you for the report, and thank you for your continued support to the server.
 
Hello, so sorry for the late response!

So the matter of the report on me, firstly l do understand your frustrations about it and I am in no way trying to belittle them.

From my part, Zyp asked in staff chat if someone could unstuck you as you were down on the floor of the map. I said I would do it, as being apart of a team we help each other out. You were warned, as well as others not to do so hence why anyone who was on the floor of the map was getting unstucked.

I will also add that people being on the floor of the map was causing delays on the progression of the game, so add that with the warns, I do believe what Zyp and myself did was warranted within our protocols.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just want to respond with this, WeissView attachment 56 Refer to the 2nd rule on the !motd if you were ordered warning and instruction multiple times you should have refrained from doing it again.

noting on this; the very general wording of that rule is dangerous. not to say i expect any staff to abuse this rule as-is but, as-is, this rule basically makes it so that any staff can tell me to stop talking just because they dont like how im talking to them and i have to comply. "have to" is a strong phrase, but that's what that 3 rule blurb entails- otherwise i can be kicked or even banned.

snipped for length

this is much better, and more accurately expresses what is expected of players and what they can and cannot do. though i do recommend at that point, the rule header should be adjusted to "Prop Surfing / Unreachable Areas" because otherwise it can still be very easily misconstrued that only prop surfing to unreachable areas is the primary issue.

snipped for length

understandable until the point of delays- at no point during the time that we played this map did anyone delay the round who happened to be on the floor. i wont argue about the map at length here because it just isnt really the place; but even without any moderator intervention, no player on the bottom was hiding to escape dying, or was a traitor unable to kill people at the top, or anything of the sort. in addition- the traitors have access to the exact same method of reaching the bottom floor as innos do, it isn't destroyable, so if they want to come down to make it easier to kill me, they very much so can.

One major rule of moderators is that they follow their rules provided to them to the letter, and generally must go to an admin or greater for discretion regarding rulings like this.

Something to keep in mind about this situation is that Zyp had acted on what were considered the rules and protocol at the time. You are correct to say that that area is in fact reachable without the use of props, and should be able to be accessed in theory.

The problem with "unreachable" areas is that they tend to cause delays in the game, which makes things uncomfortable for everyone waiting, especially during overtime or the end of a round.

So whether or not you had a right to as of the current rules be there - you were warned to attempt to leave that area or risk being slain/brought. You had clearly seen others being brought for the same reason. It was inevitable you'd be brought for the same reason had you not complied.

Zyp did nothing wrong in this capacity and was acting on what he knows in the listed protocol. Next time please refrain from trying to access unintended areas of the map.

keeping this full because there's specifics that i want to address here.

first you say that Zyp acted on what the rules and protocol were- okay. and then you also agree with me that at that point, i was accessing an area that is accessible based upon the present protocol. but then at the last line, you circle back and suddenly say that the listed protocol that zyp followed was right? so which of the two is it, is zyp's ruling and protocol correct and that the bottom zone is inaccessible and therefore he should tp me up; or was the rules at the time correct in allowing me to be down there because i dont have to prop surf?

if you're trying to argue that the virtue of delaying is the reason that his ruling is right and that gives him the right to tp me, zyp should have evidence that proves that my (or others) being there was the cause of delays occurring during the round. i suppose since i dont have my own video evidence, you'd have to take me by my words or maybe look in the logs of that round, but there were no delays that even started because of people being on the ground floor. people were being teleported even before overtime had begun, if that's where the beginning of a basis of "delaying" starts.

vFWk8HMt2ukY.png


however, there isn't a basis of delaying listed in the rules, so realistically anyone can be delaying even 2 seconds into the start of the round if they decide to lock themselves in a room and restrict methods for the traitors to get to them, because they're postponing an effort for the Ts to kill them, right? and there isn't even a listed punishment to go along with what happens if you are "delaying". is a camping inno going to get teleported out of a room in inno motel that they've managed to block the door of? or is it just a slay, even if they cant physically get out of the room anymore by their own methods?

all of this said, i do want to reiterate, there is no bad blood or intentions i have with bringing this up or being a stickler for how rules are worded; and im not even looking for punishment. what i am trying to do is try to get an idea of how exactly you want to run this server, because as of right now, there's a lot of holes that honestly i didn't even recognize until i really combed through your extended rules. of which, i do plan on giving suggestions towards. sorry, if i come across as anal about it all- but having holes in your rules can just make for even rougher times in the future.
 
Okay, let's wrap this report up in a grand box with a nice bow and send it to it's conclusion, shall we? Surely!

@Weiss

*On the subject of accessibility of this map's ground level:

As for what I can gleam from inspecting the map in 1p mode, the area on the "ground level" of this map is indeed not intended to be populated at any time by it's original creator. (A user simply called "TC") I tried several times to fall to the ground level, only to be met with death every time. This would clearly indicate that TC intended for players to remain atop the buildings at all times.

As for your method of "landing on the geometry of a trashcan" to access the ground level, I would argue that you are taking advantage of a blip/glitch in the physics of the game or the game engine itself to circumvent the map design as TC intended. This offset of damage in landing on the trashcan obviously allows you to survive by changing the vectors of travel, as well as their magnitudes, to allow a more "safe" landing. By this logic, plus that in the previous paragraph, you are indeed circumventing the intended design of the map by exploiting a known flaw in the game/game engine. I further contend that if TC had intended for people to reach the ground level, that more easy methods to do so would've been added during the design phase of the map.

*On the subject of round delay:

I find that by going back to the ground level of the map after being both warned and brought back "in-bounds" by @Zyp and @Pixie Dimitri , that you did indeed cause not only a delay in the time period of a map, but also tied up those staff member's time in having to deal with these actions by yourself and others.

Part 3 of the rule on Camping and Delaying states that "Delaying is when you postpone an effort to fulfill an objective, or timer stall." You violated both parts of this rule. You've not only postponed the 2 key objectives of the game (The Innocent finding and eliminating the Traitors, and vice versa) and also caused timer delay as well by continually going down there. You are postponing your objective as an inno to actively hunt the T's, and making it more difficult for the T's to fulfill their objective of killing you, by intentionally placing more distance between yourself and the T's as well as going down there to "do your own thing". You might be able to consistently land on the trashcan to avoid damage, but that doesn't mean that everyone has the same level of skill. You might be able to accurately shoot people from the ground, but others might also not be as adept at shooting you from the top of the buildings. Also, going down there unnecessarily lengthened the rounds, which can cause server pop to decrease.

To put it into perspective, if this was DarkRP, you'd definitely be facing a sit for FailRP for doing this.

*On the subject of the rules:

Let's not lie to each other here. There's never going to be a ruleset that covers every single contingency. To say otherwise would be unwise and a straight up fallacy. While you do have a valid point that there are holes in our rules, your explanation of these holes in our rules to justify your actions is just being pedantic.

Rule 2 of the general rules states "Comply with any warning or instruction given by the staff team." This allows our staff to fill in these holes in our rules at least for the time being by allowing them to give on-the-spot instructions while a change to the rules is being suggested, considered, and implemented.

By going back down to the ground level after being told not to, you opened yourself up to staff actions, to include bringing and (potentially) mid-round slays.

Also, I'm going to take issue with a particular point you've made:

noting on this; the very general wording of that rule is dangerous. not to say i expect any staff to abuse this rule as-is but, as-is, this rule basically makes it so that any staff can tell me to stop talking just because they dont like how im talking to them and i have to comply. "have to" is a strong phrase, but that's what that 3 rule blurb entails- otherwise i can be kicked or even banned.

You're making a slippery slope fallacy here. Just because it can happen doesn't mean it will. We take our roles as staff members seriously, and hold ourselves to a higher standard than everyone else. I suspect very strongly that any staff member who would do anything remotely similar to this would find themselves swiftly demoted to player.

On the subject of staffing:

Our staff works as a team to deal with any rule violations or disturbances to the server environment. This means that a staff member can issue a staff action without prior involvement with the situation at hand. However, the staff member will usually have already communicated with other staff and come to a full understanding of the situation before doing so.

To Conclude:

1. I find that the portion against my mod Pixie Dimitri is invalid.
2. The admin Husky has found the portion of the report against their mod Zyp is invalid.

Due to these I will be closing this report and marking it as invalid.

If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to contact me or Husky, or our Lead Admins Noctorious or Uncle Dad.

Report: INVALID
Thread: Locked
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top